IceCube Search for Extremely High-energy Neutrinos Contributes to Understanding of Cosmic Rays

Neutrinos are chargeless, weakly interacting particles that are able to travel undeflected through the cosmos. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole searches for the sources of these astrophysical neutrinos in order to understand the origin of high-energy particles called cosmic rays and, therefore, how the universe works. 

IceCube has already shown that neutrinos can exist up to about 10 PeV in energy, but both experimental and theoretical evidence suggests extremely high-energy (EHE) neutrinos should reach higher energies. One component, called cosmogenic neutrinos, are expected to be produced when the highest energy cosmic rays interact with the cosmic microwave background. These EHE neutrinos would have an astounding one joule of energy per particle, or higher.

By understanding the properties of cosmogenic neutrinos, such as their quantity and distribution in energy, scientists are hoping to solve the 100-year-old mystery of the origin of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs), with energies exceeding 1 EeV. In a study submitted to Physical Review Letters, the IceCube Collaboration presents a search for EHE neutrinos using 12.6 years of IceCube data. The nondetection of neutrinos with energies well above 10 PeV improves the upper limit on the allowed EHE neutrino flux by a factor of two, the most stringent limit to date. The collaborators also used the neutrino data to probe UHECRs directly. This analysis is the first result using neutrino data to disfavor the hypothesis that UHECRs are composed only of protons.

This figure shows the neutrino landscape at the highest energies between a few PeV and 100 EeV (1020 eV). The red line shows the flux limit we set due to not observing any neutrinos with extremely high energies. It is compared to the previous IceCube result using 9 years of data and to a measurement made by the Auger collaboration. Models of the extremely high-energy neutrino flux are shown in grey (cosmogenic neutrinos) and light blue (neutrinos from AGN), which we can also constrain with our analysis. Credit: IceCube CollaborationThis figure shows the neutrino landscape at the highest energies between a few PeV and 100 EeV (1020 eV). The red line shows the flux limit we set due to not observing any neutrinos with extremely high energies. It is compared to the previous IceCube result using 9 years of data and to a measurement made by the Auger collaboration. Models of the extremely high-energy neutrino flux are shown in grey (cosmogenic neutrinos) and light blue (neutrinos from AGN), which we can also constrain with our analysis. Credit: IceCube CollaborationIn the search for EHE neutrinos, researchers looked for neutrino “events” where neutrinos deposited a huge amount of light inside the detector. However, because most high-energy neutrinos are absorbed by the Earth, the focus of the study shifted to neutrinos arriving sideways at (horizontal) or above (downgoing) IceCube. Focusing on horizontal events in particular also allowed the researchers to eliminate most of the overwhelming background of atmospheric muons caused by cosmic-ray interactions above IceCube in the atmosphere.

 Using a novel method developed by Maximilian Meier, an assistant professor at Chiba University in Japan and colead on the study, they were able to identify how “clumpy” or stochastic an event was, which was helpful because true neutrino events are more stochastic than the cosmic-ray background.

“The non-observation of cosmogenic neutrinos tells us, under some pretty conservative modeling assumptions, that the cosmic-ray flux is mostly composed of elements heavier than protons,” says Brian Clark, an assistant professor at the University of Maryland and colead on the study. “This is a big open question and something scientists have been trying to answer for almost one hundred years.” 

Clark adds that the two other large-scale particle astrophysics experiments—the Pierre Auger Observatory and the Telescope Array—have been trying to answer the same question for almost a decade. Because they measure the cosmic-ray air showers directly, interpreting the data relies on sophisticated modeling of the nuclear physics of cosmic-ray interactions. This is where IceCube offers a complementary approach that, as described in the paper, is largely insensitive to those modeling uncertainties. This makes it an important, independent confirmation of the results obtained by air shower experiments. Brian ClarkBrian ClarkMaximilian MeierMaximilian Meier

“This is the first time a neutrino telescope has managed to do this. And it was a major promise of the discipline, so it’s very exciting to see it happen,” says Clark. 

Future studies by the IceCube Collaboration will look to machine learning in order to extract the most out of the IceCube data. 

“We are really excited to see the next generation of detectors, like IceCube-Gen2, come online, which will be ten times larger than IceCube and, therefore, significantly increase our capabilities to detect cosmogenic neutrinos in the future,” says Meier.

+ info “A search for extremely-high-energy neutrinos and first constraints on the ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray proton fraction with IceCube,” IceCube Collaboration: R. Abbasi et al. Submitted to Physical Review Letters. arxiv.org/abs/2502.01963

Original story by 

Kiyong Kim Elected as a Fellow of Optica

Kiyong Kim has been selected as a 2025 Optica Fellow for his pioneering contributions to the generation and understanding of terahertz radiation from strong laser field interactions with matter.  He is one of 121 members, from 27 countries, selected for their significant contributions to the advancement of optics and photonics through education, research, engineering, business leadership and sKiyong KimKiyong Kimervice.

Kim received his B.S. from Korea University and his Ph.D. from the University of Maryland. His graduate research focused on measuring ultrafast dynamics in the interaction of intense laser pulses with gases, atomic clusters, and plasmas. This work earned him the Marshall N. Rosenbluth Outstanding Doctoral Thesis Award from the American Physical Society.

Following his doctoral studies, Kim moved to Los Alamos National Laboratory as a Director’s Postdoctoral Fellow and while there received a Distinguished Performance Award. After accepting a position as an Assistant Professor at the University of Maryland in 2008, he received a DOE Early Career Research Award and an NSF Faculty Early Career Development Award. Kim also received the departmental Richard A. Ferrell Distinguished Faculty Fellowship in 2014.

From 2021 to 2022, Kim held appointments at Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) and the Center for Relativistic Laser Science (CoReLS) at the Korean Institute for Basic Science, leading experiments on petawatt laser-driven electron acceleration, nonlinear Compton scattering of petawatt laser pulses and GeV electrons, and high-power terahertz generation.

With colleagues in physics and the Institute for Research in Electronics & Applied Physics (IREAP), he is co-PI on a $1.61M Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) award from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to upgrade high-power laser systems at UMD.

 

Faculty, Staff, Student and Alumni Awards & Notes

We proudly recognize members of our community who recently garnered major honors, began new positions and more.

Faculty and Staff 
Students
Alumni
  • Adam Ehrenberg (Ph.D, '24) joined the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) as a Research Staff Member.
  • Chad Mitchell (Ph.D., '07) is a physicist at the Accelerator Technology & Applied Physics Division of Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
  • Luke Sollitt (B.S., '97) is a planetary physicist for NASA.
  • C. V. Vishveshwara (Ph.D., '68) was recalled as Scientist of the Day on March 6, 2025.
Department News 

Finding the Beauty in Physics

Phoebe Hamilton’s (M.S. ’11, Ph.D. ’13, physics) research career at the University of Maryland could have ended when she earned her Ph.D. Instead, it marked the start of an exciting challenge—for Hamilton and her fellow high-energy physics researchers in UMD’s Department of Physics.
Phoebe Hamilton, Elizabeth Kowalczyk and Othello Gomes check a photodetector.Phoebe Hamilton, Elizabeth Kowalczyk and Othello Gomes check a photodetector.In fall 2012, Distinguished University Professor and Gus T. Zorn Professor Hassan Jawahery eyed a new opportunity after his research group wrapped up with BaBar, a collider experiment in California.

“BaBar had finished collecting new data and we were looking for the next gig for the group,” Hamilton recalled. “Hassan was my Ph.D. advisor and we talked about how exciting it would be to move to the Large Hadron Collider beauty—LHCb—experiment.”

Just two months before Hamilton defended her dissertation, Jawahery’s group learned that they had been formally accepted into the LHCb experiment, which is named after its primary research subject: a particle called the beauty quark, also known as a bottom quark or b quark. By studying bottom quarks produced by proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider located near Geneva, Switzerland, researchers hope to come closer to understanding why there is so much matter but so little antimatter in the universe.

Excited by the opportunity to discover new physics at the world’s most powerful particle accelerator, Hamilton stayed at UMD. As a postdoctoral researcher from 2012 to 2020 and a faculty specialist from 2020 to 2023, she developed tools that enabled the LHCb to take measurements previously thought “impossible” by some scientists.

Now, as an assistant professor of physics, her contributions continue to level up the LHCb’s abilities, improving its chances of making groundbreaking findings.

“Getting to stay a postdoc as long as I did at Maryland was a real blessing,” Hamilton said. “I wasn’t sure I’d actually have the chance to become an assistant professor, but I'm very happy to get to do it. Maryland is such a home and such a family to me.”

Raising the BaBar

Hamilton’s interest in physics began in high school and she nurtured it with books about string theory by physicist Brian Greene. After graduating, she enrolled at Youngstown State University to pursue computer science, another one of her interests, but switched to physics after realizing that it inspired and challenged her more than any other subject.

“I like knowing how things work,” said Hamilton, who also enjoys learning new musical instruments for similar reasons. “The fact that physics is orderly and follows these predictable rules has always been fascinating to me.”

Hamilton quickly took to particle physics, and after earning her bachelor’s degree in 2007, she decided to pursue particle theory research in UMD’s graduate program. She chose UMD because of its wide range of research possibilities, which allowed her to try out different specializations before committing.

“I thought I knew what I wanted to do, but there was doubt,” she said. “With UMD, I thought to myself, ‘This is where I’m going to be able to thrive no matter what I do.’”

Hamilton soon discovered she enjoyed the experimental side of particle physics much more than theory. So when Associate Professor Doug Roberts put up flyers seeking student researchers for the BaBar experiment, Hamilton jumped at the chance.

BaBar was Hamilton’s introduction to experimental studies of CP violation, which occurs when two conservation laws of particle physics—charge conjugation and parity—are broken. By measuring CP violation at experiments like BaBar, researchers can begin to understand the differences between matter and antimatter.

“I fell in love with it very quickly,” Hamilton said of BaBar. “It was a fantastic machine and a fantastic experiment.”

Hamilton’s research contributed to the first measurement of how Bs mesons, a family of subatomic particles called mesons that contain a bottom quark and a strange antiquark, are produced at different collision energies. Ultimately, the BaBar experiment shed light on how antimatter is produced and set the stage for Hamilton’s participation in an even bigger—but messier—collider.

“The beautiful thing at BaBar was that you would get two hadrons containing bottom quarks and nothing else, so it was very clean and very easy to measure what was going on,” Hamilton said. “Here [at the LHCb], colliding protons is like colliding handfuls of rock salt. You get 100 reconstructed particles in every event and you have to sort through it.”

Achieving the ‘impossible’

For the last 12 years, Hamilton has been working to make those messy collisions a little easier to interpret. UMD’s contribution to the LHCb experiment falls within the realm of lepton flavor universality: a physics principle stating that the only difference between different “flavors,” or types, of leptons—including electrons, muons and tau leptons—is their mass. 

The LHCb is a good fit for this type of research because it analyzes a large number of particles containing b quarks, which transform, or decay, into leptons. In the beginning, though, some scientists thought that lepton flavor universality couldn’t be done at the LHCb because either one or three neutrinos escape undetected during collisions, making it difficult to determine all of the energies and momenta needed to distinguish muons from tau leptons. 

“Because of the messy nature of these proton-proton collisions, the consensus was that this was too hard for LHCb to do,” Hamilton said. “But Jawahery and I worked together on a technique to make some wild approximations and figure out a way to do it anyway.”

And they did figure out a way. Developed from 2013 to 2015 in collaboration with LHCb researcher Greg Ciezarek, their method of analyzing decays led to measurements of lepton flavor universality between muons and tau leptons that were previously thought impossible. 

“It was interesting to go from ‘This is probably another dead-end’ to ‘Oh, this might actually be worth something’ to ‘This is actually the star of the experiment right now,’” Hamilton said. “This is still an active area of research for us. We extended and superseded the 2015 measurement in 2023 and are working on the next generation of this in the data from the second run of the LHC.”

Cracking the K-pi puzzle

Over the years, Hamilton has also played a key role in making the LHCb’s equipment more durable and better at discerning different particles. She helped develop electronics for the Upstream Tracker sub-detector for the experiment’s first upgrade from 2022 to 2023 and is now testing new photodetectors in her lab. These new detectors would measure the light produced in upgraded modules for the LHCb’s calorimeter, which stops particles as they pass through and enables researchers to measure the energy deposited. 

This planned upgrade to the calorimeter aims to make energy measurements more precise, which can ultimately help researchers determine which particles were produced in a collision event.

“One of the big motivations for upgrading the calorimeter is making some of the granularity smaller so that you can tell different particles apart,” Hamilton explained. “Along with the ability to precisely measure the time different particles arrive, it should in principle be able to cope with five times the collision rate.”

Whether Hamilton is toiling in the lab or analyzing data from the LHCb, she continues to find inspiration in physics’ most puzzling questions. She recently submitted a research proposal to dive deeper into matter-antimatter asymmetries and continues to work on developing new and improved techniques for her research. 

From 2014 to 2015, she and her colleagues at UMD developed a way to study b-hadron decays with only one reconstructed trajectory, meaning that certain key information is missing. She believes this technique can now be applied to a persistent challenge in physics called the K-pi puzzle.

“The K-pi puzzle is the possibility that the Standard Model fails to explain the pattern of matter-antimatter asymmetry in b-hadron decays to two pseudo-stable mesons, pions or kaons—or one of each. The Standard Model predicts specific patterns to their CP asymmetries, which we can use to check the Standard Model’s validity, but theorists need measurements of them all,” Hamilton explained. “Some of these involve two trajectories to reconstruct and identify the b-hadron but many do not, and these tend to be the less understood ones.”

Going forward, Hamilton hopes to make more “impossible measurements”—and perhaps challenge or reshape the Standard Model of physics in the process.

“We have an opportunity to contribute to understanding this puzzle in some of the areas that are fuzziest right now,” Hamilton said, “and I think there's exciting things to be tried there.”

 

Written by Emily Nunez