Researchers Comb Atoms into a Novel Swirl

When you brush your hair in the morning, there’s a pretty good chance you’re not thinking about quantum physics. But the way your hair swirls as you brush is actually related to some features of the quantum world.

Important properties of quantum particles are described by topology—a field of mathematics that classifies objects according to how many holes they have. For instance, a coconut is topologically the same as a pizza (no holes), but different from a donut (one hole). Importantly, topology also dictates the kinds of hairdos you can style on these shapes. On a fuzzy coconut, no matter how much you brush, you’ll end up with at least one whorl—a spot that all the nearby hairs swirl around. On the other hand, a hairy donut can be brushed down flat without incurring any unsightly tufts or whorls. It can also have pairs of whorls, swirling in opposite directions, but never a single whorl.

This is not merely a question of fashion. In physical materials, topology can determine many interesting properties, like whether a material conducts electricity or not—particularly at its edges. Additionally, these edge properties are extremely precise and stable—so stable that they now serve as the standard for measuring electrical resistance.

Physicists don’t usually re-shape the materials they study into donuts or attach hairs to them. Instead, they often look at the topology of the quantum states of a particle moving around in the material. The coconut or donut shapes are found in abstract landscapes, inhabited by the possible speeds and directions the particle is moving—in technical language, each point in this space corresponds to a particular momentum. At each momentum, a “hair” sticks out, representing the internal quantum state of the particle. For solid materials, whose atoms line up into repeating crystal structures, the landscape is usually donut-shaped, and quantum whorls either don’t form at all or appear in pairs.Scientist created a swirl around a central point (white dot) in the quantum state of atoms (left), akin to a whorl of hair on a baby’s head (right). (Credit: Ana Valdes/JQI)Scientist created a swirl around a central point (white dot) in the quantum state of atoms (left), akin to a whorl of hair on a baby’s head (right). (Credit: Ana Valdes/JQI)

Now, a team of JQI researchers has engineered a new kind of topological matter—one with a single whorl—by breaking free from the constraints of crystalline solids. They managed to do this by grooming their atomic states into a whorl situated in an abstract, infinite plane, rather than a coconut or donut shape. The team was led by former UMD graduate student Ana Valdes-Curiel (currently a postdoc at the University of California, Los Angeles) in the group of Adjunct Professor and JQI Fellow Ian Spielman, a fellow at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. They reported their findings in a recent paper published in Nature Communications.(link is external)

In most solids, be they metals, insulators or superconductors, atoms arrange themselves in a repeating grid. Some electrons in the atoms can travel around in this grid, moving up and down or left and right. But no matter where an electron travels, it will end up experiencing deja vu: The grid of atoms repeats, so any given spot in the crystal looks exactly like many others.

This repeating structure has an effect on an electron’s momentum, too. In fact, topologically speaking, it’s as if the electron’s momentum is constrained to the surface of a donut. And since the donut can be brushed smooth, most materials have quantum state “hairs” that are swirl free. (They can also form two whorls, with hairs spiraling around them in opposite directions.)

To create their quantum whorl without the benefit of a neatly arranged crystal, the JQI team took a cloud of rubidium atoms and cooled it down to extremely low temperatures—so cold that quantum effects take over. At these temperatures, the atoms can inhabit only a few distinct quantum states. But, crucially, without the regular order of a crystal, there was no restriction on their momenta—they could move at any speed, up and down as well as left and right, forming a topological landscape of possible momenta akin to an infinite sheet.

Once the atoms were cooled, the team used three laser beams with precisely chosen colors and orientations to shuffle the atoms between three of the possible quantum states in sequence: first to second to third and back to first again. With each hop between states, the lasers imparted a small kick to the atoms, causing atoms in different states to move with slightly different speeds (and thus different momenta). This ensured that the quantum “hairs” pointed in different directions at different momenta and created a swirl around a point in the momentum landscape—the quantum whorl.

“And it turns out with this kind of atom, implementing that idea in a robust way is just super hard,” Spielman says.

Not all states can be manipulated to hop in a circle, and the ones that can are pretty unstable, quickly decaying and heating the cold atomic cloud. They are also easily disturbed by the tiniest changes in the lab’s magnetic field—something as small as a person walking by with a metal keychain can throw the whole thing off.

To mitigate these issues, the researchers employed a technique that they recently pioneered(link is external). They bathed the atoms in a strong, carefully chosen radio-frequency signal before the lasers were turned on. In this field, three stable states are transformed into quantum superpositions of each other, with parts of the other states mixed in. It’s normally impossible to make an atom hop in a circle through these stable states, but once they are jumbled together this restriction is lifted. On top of that, the strong magnetic field of the radio waves inoculated the atoms against small magnetic field disturbances.

They confirmed the novel topology of their cloud of atoms by directly measuring the quantum states they created, at a host of different atom momenta. Traversing their momentum landscape in a loop, they measured what mixture of the constituent states (the first, second, and third states in the circle) the atoms lived in, analogous to looking which direction the hairs were pointing. They confirmed that there was a single swirl at the loop’s center.

One of the most important features of topological materials is the edge effects that occur at an interface with a material that has a different topology. For example, if an insulator happens to have two swirls on its momentum donut, there will be a sharp change whenever it’s bordered by swirl-free air or a vacuum. At the place where materials with different swirl counts meet, something discontinuous has to happen. In this case, the boundary becomes a conductor sandwiched between two insulators. The number of these conducting edge channels exactly corresponds to the topology in the bulk, and they cannot be easily disrupted or destroyed. The discovery and topological explanation of these edge effects was the subject of the 2016 Nobel Prize in Physics(link is external), and has inspired much recent research and development of new types of devices.

“The whole big thing about topology is you get these edge states that are very robust,” says Valdes-Curiel “And now you have this system that is topological, but it doesn’t have the usual topological features. So what happens with the usual bulk-edge correspondence? What kind of edge states do you have? And what kind of topological devices can you build?”

Story by Dina Genkina

In addition to Valdes-Curiel and Spielman, co-authors of this paper included Dimitios Trypogeorgos, a former JQI postdoc now at the at the Institute of Nanotechnology in Lecce, Italy; Qiyu Liang, a postdoc at the JQI; and Russel Anderson, a former visiting researcher at the JQI now at La Trobe University and Q-CTRL.

Research Contact:  Ian Spielman, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
(link sends e-mail)

Buonanno Receives Galileo Galilei Medal

Alessandra Buonanno has been awarded the Galileo Galilei Medal by the National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN). Buonanno was cited with Thibault Damour of the Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques in Paris and Frans Pretorius of Princeton University “for the fundamental understanding of sources of gravitational radiation by complementary analytic and numerical techniques, enabling predictions that have been confirmed by gravitational wave observations and are now key tools in this new branch of astronomy”.  

Stefania De Curtis, director of the Galileo Galilei Institute, wrote that "Professors Buonanno and Damour, and professor Pretorius proposed two complementary approaches, analytical and numerical, to describe the behavior of two black holes spiraling around each other until they collide. Their description was used for the analysis of experimental data that, in 2015, led the LIGO and VIRGO scientific collaborations to the observation of the first gravitational waves emitted by the collision of two black holes". 2021 Galileo Galilei medal2021 Galileo Galilei medal

Buonanno is the director of the Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity Department at the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Potsdam and a Research Professor at the University of Maryland. She joined the UMD Physics in 2005, and received an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Fellowship and the Richard A. Ferrell Distinguished Faculty Fellowship. She is a Fellow of the American Physical Society and the International Society of General Relativity and Gravitation. In 2018, she received the Leibniz Prize, Germany's prestigious research award. 

In discussing the work that led to the Galilei Medal, Buonanno explained that "To identify the source that generated the gravitational waves we observe on Earth, we need hundred thousand of waveform models. To achieve this goal about 20 years ago we introduced a novel approach to solve analytically the two-body problem in general relativity. This approach paved the way to develop the highly precise waveform models that today are routinely used by LIGO and VIRGO to detect binary systems composed of black holes and neutron stars and infer unique information about astrophysics, cosmology and gravity”. She offers futher discussion in this video.  

Buonanno and others detailed UMD's contributions to gravitational studies in a 2016 forum, A Celebration of Gravitational Waves

=====================================

This story was adapted from the INFN website; for further information on the award, see https://home.infn.it/en/media-outreach/press-releases/4303-the-2021-galileo-galilei-medal-goes-to-alessandra-buonanno-thibault-damour-and-frans-pretorius

CU²MiP: Online and Expanded

In January 2021, the University of Maryland’s Department of Physics and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) hosted the third Conference for Undergraduate Underrepresented Minorities in Physics (CU²MiP). The conference launched in 2016 to address the historically low representation of minorities in the physics community.

This year, UMD President Darryll J. Pines gave a welcoming and encouraging address. UMD College of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences Dean Amitabh Varshney, NIST director Walter Copan. Physics Chair Steve Rolston, Rowan University’s Tabbatha Dobbins and Howard University Thomas A. Searles were among many speakers, workshop leaders and panelists.

Though COVID-19 required an online gathering this year, organizers adapted and expanded the program in significant ways, offering a research panel on quantum science, helpful videos and an entire slate for high school students.

“The quantum panel and quantum speakers for both undergrad and high school were very well received,” said Donna Hammer, director of education for the Department of Physics. Among the speakers at the quantum panel was alumna Ana Maria Rey (Ph.D. ’04), recipient of a MacArthur “genius” grant.

CU²MiP videos included several lab tours, as well as interviews with UMD students explaining their choice and enjoyment of physics.CU2MiP Collage

Other CU2MiP highlights included a fireside chat where College Park Professor Sylvester James Gates Jr. was interviewed by his daughter, Delilah Gates (B.S. ’15), who is now a physics Ph.D. candidate at Harvard University. The elder Gates mentioned events in his life that helped him succeed as a physicist and contribute to society. He also addressed “imposter syndrome,” which is a sense of not belonging or being good enough, and discussed ways that students might overcome it.

Jorge Ramirez Ortiz and Daniel Serrano of UMD gave a presentation on Rostros Físicos, a new multimedia celebration of the successes of Latinx/Latin American physicists across all stages of the scientific career path.

Fostering collegiality has always been a primary CU²MiP goal, and this year’s virtual gathering continued this emphasis.

“Adding mentoring chats throughout the conference fostered meaningful networking beyond the breakout rooms associated with the panels and workshops,” Hammer said. “Drop-in mentoring provided shared stories, guidance and collaboration in real time.”

Undergraduates responded positively.

“It was great to meet people and I found all of the speakers inspiring and engaging!” wrote one participant. Another expressed gratitude for the conference, noting, “I spoke with a lot of supportive people on the prospects of research.” 

The high school conference featured a plenary talk by Professor Willie Rockward, the physics department chair at Morgan State University, on “Your Pathway in Physics using Passion, Purpose, and Problem-solving.” High school student Anisha Musti discussed founding Q-munity, a group of high school students working together in quantum computing. College Park Professor and Nobel Laureate Bill Phillips, along with NIST’s Angie Hight Walker, held a Quantum Science Showcase. 

Erin Lukomska-Schlauch, chair of the science department at Charles Herbert Flowers High School in Prince George’s County, helped to organize the conference, and found the experience memorable.

"As an educator, I will be taking a lot of what I learned back to my students, especially from the diversity workshops,” she said. "All the sessions that I attended were all really engaging, well planned and well executed."

Cindy Hollies, a teacher who has led many UMD physics summer programs, wrote, “I logged out of the conference on Sunday evening feeling proud and impressed with the young people leading the future of physics and amazed at the inspiring opportunities this conference presented for high school students. May there be many more such conferences.”  

Hammer observed that high school students learned about the many career opportunities opened by degrees in physics. As one student wrote, “…although I have taken a physics class, I didn't know much about its applications. I am very excited to take more related classes in college.”

Rolston, the department chair, was pleased with the undergraduate program and the extended efforts for high school students.

“We are grateful to everyone who contributed to CU²MiP,” he said. “Studying physics is a great path, not only to research and teaching careers, but to an extremely wide range of interesting professions. And the discipline itself helps develop a discerning way of seeing the world.”

"CU²MiP is a catalyst for change,” summarized Hammer. “The outcomes of each conference inspire me to keep moving forward and to know, not just believe, that real, positive change is possible and happening right now. As one student said to me, ‘This conference showed me that with each day I study physics, I'm part of the solution.’”

Despite Pandemic, Physics Lab Courses Go On

Lab courses are where physics students learn firsthand that reality, even the one carefully curated by their instructors, is messy. Scales need to be recalibrated, projectiles hit lab benches instead of completing perfect arcs, and there’s always a mysterious source of issues popularly known as human error. Students traditionally tackle experiments in person, either individually or in pairs, on pre-arranged experimental stations. These are difficult things to replicate online or even in a physically distanced environment.

Nevertheless, when the pandemic hit, the UMD Department of Physics’ lab courses moved online for spring and summer 2020. And after the campus reopened in the fall, many of the lab courses were offered in person again, with a multitude of safety precautions and—perhaps most importantly—without any known spread of COVID-19.

A small cast of dedicated department staff members worked hard to pull it all off. One key figure is Allen Monroe, the assistant director of physics instructional labs, who has been at UMD for 43 years. Monroe first started working for the department in 1978 while he was still in high school.

“They called me a gopher,” said Monroe, “because I would ‘go for’ this and ‘go for’ that.”

He was hired to run the labs for classes taken by physics majors in 1984 and has remained here ever since. During this time, he went from lab manager to lab coordinator to assistant director, and he earned a bachelor’s degree in industrial education in 1994 from UMD.

Monroe says remaining at the university for this long has been easy.

“There's always something new to learn,” Monroe said. “And it's always something different. It’s fascinating. And at this point, I’m seeing the whole picture.”

The whole picture can be pretty overwhelming.

“During a typical semester up here, I've got 2,000 students roaming through these hallways going through these labs every week,” Monroe said.  

When the university moved to online classes in March, each instructor handled the situation differently: some asked students do simulations, while others provided students data to be analyzed. But this wasn’t going to work for an entire course. Monroe needed to begin planning for summer classes, which would be taught entirely online. Migrating the whole operation to Zoom was an enormous and time-sensitive undertaking—there were lab courses starting in under two months.

“We had to work very quickly,” said Monroe, “because, you know, this was early April and we had to have this stuff ready for June 1.”

But even with his decades of experience, Monroe says he could not have done it alone. He relied on Physics Professor and Joint Quantum Institute Co-director Frederick Wellstood, who has been a mainstay of the department’s labs for decades. Wellstood first began designing lab courses in the mid-1990s with Distinguished University Professor of Physics Jordan Goodman and continued to do so after he became associate chair of undergraduate education in 1999. After he left that post in 2004, he remained the go-to physicist for all lab-related things.

“This is my secret side job, this is my night job,” Wellstood said.

For more than 20 years, he designed and reinvented much of the UMD physics lab curriculum. So last spring when Monroe needed help, Wellstood stepped up to the plate.

Not only did Monroe and Wellstood have to work quickly, they had to thread a fine needle. Students needed to be able to follow the experiment without actually being in the lab, and they also needed to stay engaged and not simply watch projectiles being thrown for them.

“You don't want the students to sit there and for their first thought to be ‘This is stupid,’” Monroe said. “So you have to kind of make it interesting.”

Wellstood and Monroe decided to go for an amalgam approach wherever possible. Wellstood filmed himself doing several versions of data collection, like sending projectiles along a few different paths. The students would choose one of the experiments, watch their chosen video and analyze the corresponding data themselves. 

Once the summer courses were humming along, Wellstood and Monroe immediately started preparing for the fall. They had to figure out how to quickly convert a lot more courses to online versions, as well as how to prepare for safe if partial, return to campus.

“We were in major survival mode, or firefighting mode,” Wellstood recalled.

A team headed by Professor and Associate Chair of Undergraduate Studies Carter Hall, Director of Student Services Donna Hammer, and professors Sarah Eno, Dan Lathrop and Kara Hoffman pitched in, obtaining a grant from the Provost’s office that allowed them to hire physics graduate student Brandon Johnson and undergraduate physics major Robert Wolle to record videos of themselves doing experiments and create online versions of the lab instruction manuals.

For the courses that were small enough to be held in person, Monroe wrote up safety protocols that were approved by the university. He put fans in all the windows, spaced out the experimental stations as much as possible, and converted some of the courses to a partial schedule, with alternating halves of the class coming in each week. If students ran into trouble doing one of the in-person labs, they would call their teaching assistant via Zoom, from their station to the front of the class, to avoid putting either the students or teaching assistant at risk.

Even with all the preparation, unpredictable problems arose.

“We used to run from 8 or 9 in the morning until 10 at night,” Monroe said. “In between every one of these sections, we had to go in and sanitize the room. And that all worked pretty good until we found that we were wiping the lettering off of keyboards.”

They did some research and switched to a less-abrasive cleaning product.

By putting in many extra hours and taking advantage of everything at their disposal, including online lab manual distribution tools, partial schedules and physically distanced in-person protocols, they pulled off a successful fall semester.

“It worked reasonably well,” said Wellstood, “which means it didn't catch fire and burn down. You know, we actually got through it.”

Both Wellstood and Monroe also credit the ensemble of people that made it all possible. Labs are staffed by Omar Torres, Greg Wolter and Catherine Owens.  

“We’ve tried to make sure that we can offer in-person experiments where it's possible,” said Wellstood, “and I think it’s a credit to the university that they let us try. And it’s a credit to the instructors.”

Monroe and Wellstood were ready when in-person spring classes began this week, and they’re proud of what they’ve pulled off thus far, but they both agree this past year has been extremely tough.  

“I'm looking forward to being able to open up again someday,” said Monroe, “because oh boy, it's exhausting.”

Written by Dina Genkina