- Details
-
Published: Tuesday, March 15 2022 00:01
Eugene Wigner, a Nobel Prize-winning mathematical physicist, once said, âThe miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve.â
Indeed, mathematics may seem abstract or even irrelevant until itâs used to describe the natural world around us. The reverse is occasionally also true: Physical realities, when brought to a mathematicianâs attention, can inspire new questions and new discoveries.
The research of Alicia KollĂĄr, a Chesapeake Assistant Professor of Physics at the University of Maryland and a Fellow of the Joint Quantum Institute, embodies the give and take of this relationship between physics and mathematics. In her lab, she brings abstract theories to life and in turn collaborates on new theorems. She has forged a research program of manipulating light on a chip, coaxing the light into behaving as though it lives on the surface of a sphere, or a mathematical abstraction known as a hyperbolic surface. She also collaborates with mathematicians, furthering both the understanding of what these chips can do and their underlying mathematics.
Alicia KollĂĄrA direct collaboration with pure mathematicians is uncommon for a physicist, particularly an experimentalist. But KollĂĄr is no stranger to mathematics. Raised by two mathematicians in Princeton, New Jersey, she was exposed to the discipline early on. However, KollĂĄr said her parents didnât pressure her to pursue mathematics growing up.
âIt never crossed my dadâs mind to try to force me to do what he loved,â KollĂĄr said. âHe considered that pointless, like âYou should go into research for you, not for somebody elseâs expectations.ââ
Her father, JĂĄnos KollĂĄr, a professor of mathematics at Princeton, had a slightly different take.
âShe was always interested in science, so I didnât need to apply any influence,â he said. âIf she was only interested in rock music it might have been different.â
Free to pursue whatever she pleased (short of rock music), KollĂĄr studied advanced math, but without much enthusiasm.
âI was fortunate to be able to take quite a bit of college-level pure math as a high schooler,â she said. âAnd I would say that I think I was good at it, but I didnât love it. I just kind of didnât care.â
What really caught KollĂĄrâs attention was physics. Her high school physics teacherâs style really resonated with her.
âHe was a crusty old dude that loved Far Side cartoons,â she recalled. âAnd he wouldnât put up with anybody that was too cool for school. He taught non-calculus physics, but he taught that you have to think about itânot âHereâs a method learn how to do it.â We became really good friends, and I really liked thinking about how it works, you know, the physical intuition part of physics.â
She attended college at Princeton University, remaining in her hometown and further developing her fascination with physics.
âI was sort of divided between math and physics as a freshman,â KollĂĄr said. âBut the more physics I took, I never looked back.â
During her first summer research experience, she was charged with taking apart a telescope mount for a cosmology group. Thatâs when she found her calling as an experimentalist.
âI had a lot of fun that summer,â she said, smiling. âI ended up building a 1500-pound steel support structure. I was up to my eyeballs in machine oil and loving every minute of it.â
When applying to graduate schools, KollĂĄrâs soon-to-be Ph.D. adviser Benjamin Lev, now an associate professor of physics and applied physics at Standford University, called her and convinced her to join his lab. He enticed her with the promise that, as an atomic and optical physicist, she could do both theory and experiment side by side. She joined his group at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and, in her first year, moved with the whole team to Stanford.
KollĂĄrâs Ph.D. work consisted of building a novel experimental apparatus from scratch, designed to trap atoms and photons together and allow them to influence each other in significant, controllable ways. The resulting experimental setup launched a new direction in its field, according to Lev.
âFrom beginning to end, it was just an amazing graduate school experience, where you see something from the inception of the idea to actually showing that this new experimental technique can work,â Lev said. âAnd she was always a thought partner. We were thinking through the ideas, writing the equations on the board, working with theorists, and she was an equal thought partner on all of that.â
After graduate school, KollĂĄr found herself returning to Princeton. âPrinceton is a black hole,â she said. âYou can never quite leave. Maybe itâs the Hotel California, you know?â
She became a postdoctoral researcher in the lab of Andrew Houck, a professor of electrical and computer engineering and a Fellow in the Princeton Center for Theoretical Science. Houck worked with coplanar waveguidesâlittle paths printed on a circuit board that confine light in a tube the thickness of a human hair. These paths have become the setting of many of KollĂĄrâs mathematical explorations.
KollĂĄr was in her office one day, playing around with one of these coplanar waveguide chips. This one contained a waveguide latticeâa repeating grid, one waveguide after the other. Lattices are a familiar concept to physicists from the study of metals, where atomic nuclei form repeating patterns, extending in all three directions.
Kollarâs mathematical training bubbled up, flooding her brain with ideas. She envisioned a similar lattice, but instead of one dimension it would extend in two. And, she realized, thanks to the properties of coplanar waveguides, there was a lot of flexibility in the ways she could shape these grids.
Instead of being points, as in a conventional lattice of nuclei in a metal, the sites of this lattice were pathsâlines that guide light around. And, KollĂĄr could bend and stretch these lines however she wanted without changing the underlying physics, as long as the total length stayed the same.
KollĂĄr realized that by scrunching and stretching these waveguides, she could connect them to each other in ways that arenât possible for normal lattices of points, at least not in the world we are used to. Instead, the waveguides would act as though they are on the surface of a sphere, or a mathematical construction known as a hyperbolic surface, where traditional ideas of parallel lines, triangles and navigation break down.
A hyperbolic surface is, in a sense, the opposite of a sphere. So much so that a two-dimensional hyperbolic surface canât exist within our three-dimensional worldâbasically, it doesnât fit. KollĂĄr said the best way to imagine hyperbolic space is with some of M. C. Escherâs pictures.
KollĂĄr and her collaborators successfully showed that coplanar waveguides can indeed form lattices that act as though they live on a hyperbolic surface.
KollĂĄr found that these hyperbolic lattices had some cool physics properties. In particular, she found that they gave rise to something called flat bandsâparadoxical places where, regardless of how fast a particle is moving, its energy stays the same. These flat bands are thought to be behind some of the most intriguing unexplained physical effects, like the fractional quantum Hall effect, spin-âliquids, and even some cases of high-temperature superconductivity.
âWhen I discovered these flat bands, I actually thought I made a mistake in my code,â KollĂĄr said, âI turned around to my lab partner, and I was like, âI think I messed up but if I didnât, this is really cool.â And so at the time, we didn't understand where that was coming from. What we've since come to understand is that was really just the tip of the iceberg.â
To understand the full potential of this new technique, KollĂĄr joined forces with Peter Sarnak, professor of mathematics at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton. This collaboration has proved extremely fruitful. Together, they showed that the flat bands were far from a mistake. In fact, they proved that the flat bands must exist in any hyperbolic lattice of the kind KollĂĄr creates.
âThere's been this constant feedback between very general math theorems leading to good examples and then good examples leading to new math theorems,â KollĂĄr said.
Now, she is leading her own group at UMD and is working on coupling bits of quantum informationâcalled qubitsâto these exotic lattices. She has assembled a group of like-minded students, interested in addressing novel physics. Although thereâs no way to know exactly what the future holds for KollĂĄr, itâs fair to anticipate that she will continue to follow her nose to interesting and unexpected places.
âI think what was special about Alicia is that she always had her own mind and she did not want to follow what others were doing,â her father, JĂĄnos, said. âIt can be frustrating when you're a two-year-old, but I think in the long run if you can follow your own mind very seriously it can work out very well.â
Written by Dina Genkina